Skip to main content

Petition filed in Supreme Court to compulsory show “Country of origin” for all products on e- commerce site

Petition filed in Supreme Court to compulsory show “Country of origin” for all products on e- commerce site Introduction A writ petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to formulate a law that mandates all the e-commerce industry/ business houses selling goods in India, through any channel to display the Country of Origin in such a way that is legible easily by the consumers; making the consumer’s aware of the ‘Country of Origin’ so as the Consumer can make an informed decision. Petition was raised on the following Questions of Law? Whether the consumer has the right to know the ‘Country of Origin’ or not so as to take a conscious decision? Whether Respondent shall attract penalties upon the e-commerce industry for non- disclosure of the ‘Country of Origin’ on the products they are selling, as it is nothing less than cheating with the consumers, as it is a matter of right for the consumers to be aware about the Country ...

Buyer eligible to avail full ITC even when tax rate charged by seller on goods is higher than the specified rate: HC

Buyer eligible to avail full ITC even when tax rate charged by seller on goods is higher than the specified rate: HC

Buyer eligible to avail full ITC even when tax rate charged by seller on goods is higher than the specified rate: HC

Visteon Automotive Systems (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner – [2020] 117

The petitioner registered under Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (the Act) had purchased “capital goods” for manufacturing purpose and availed input tax credit. As per the Act, the “capital goods” were liable to VAT at 4%.

However, the dealer who sold the “capital goods” to the petitioner charged VAT at 12.5% and passed on the incidence of such tax to the petitioner.

The petitioner therefore availed the tax paid and reflected in the invoice at 12.5%.

The department has issued show cause notice (SCN) contending that the “capital goods” were liable to VAT only at 4%, therefore, the petitioner was liable to reverse input tax credit in excess of 4% and accordingly the petitioner was required to reverse credit availed equivalent to 8.5% VAT paid in excess by the registered dealer who sold the capital goods to the petitioner.

The honorable Madras High Court observed that input tax credit can be availed on the strength of the invoice on the tax paid by the registered dealer who sells such capital goods or input.

As a person availing input tax credit, the petitioner had to merely satisfy that the tax reflected in the invoice was paid by the registered dealer who sold the capital goods to it.

The High Court relied on its own decision in case Sara Leathers v. Commercial Tax Officer, [2010] 30 VST 581 (Mad.) and held that credit availed by the petitioner could not be disallowed even if registered dealer had deliberately paid tax in excess and passed on incidence of such tax.



Gst update in hindi



क्रेताओं द्वारा पूर्ण आइटीसी प्राप्त करने के योग्य पात्र तब भी जब सामान पर विक्रेता द्वारा लगाया गया कर निर्धारित दर से अधिक हो: एच.सी.

क्रेताओं द्वारा पूर्ण आइटीसी प्राप्त करने के योग्य पात्र तब भी जब सामान पर विक्रेता द्वारा लगाया गया कर निर्धारित दर से अधिक हो: एच.सी.

विस्टोन ऑटोमोटिव सिस्टम्स (पी।) लिमिटेड वी। डिप्टी कमिश्नर - [2020] 117

तमिलनाडु वैल्यू एडेड टैक्स एक्ट, 2006 (अधिनियम) के तहत पंजीकृत याचिकाकर्ता ने विनिर्माण उद्देश्य के लिए "पूंजीगत सामान" खरीदा था और सब्सक्राइबर क्रेडिट क्रेडिट का लाभ उठाया था।  अधिनियम के अनुसार, "पूंजीगत वस्तुएं" 4% पर वैट के लिए उत्तरदायी थीं।

हालाँकि, याचिकाकर्ता को "पूंजीगत सामान" बेचने वाले डीलर ने 12.5% ​​वैट वसूला और याचिकाकर्ता को इस तरह के कर की घटनाओं को पारित किया।

याचिकाकर्ता ने भुगतान किए गए कर का लाभ उठाया और 12.5% ​​चालान में दर्शाया।

विभाग ने कारण बताओ नोटिस (SCN) जारी किया है, जिसमें कहा गया है कि "पूंजीगत सामान" वैट के लिए केवल 4% पर उत्तरदायी थे, इसलिए, याचिकाकर्ता को 4% से अधिक इनपुट टैक्स क्रेडिट को रिवर्स करने के लिए उत्तरदायी था और तदनुसार याचिकाकर्ता को रिवर्स करने की आवश्यकता थी  याचिकाकर्ता को पूंजीगत सामान बेचने वाले पंजीकृत डीलर द्वारा अधिक में भुगतान किए गए 8.5% वैट के बराबर क्रेडिट प्राप्त हुआ।

माननीय मद्रास उच्च न्यायालय ने देखा कि ऐसे पूंजीगत सामान या इनपुट बेचने वाले पंजीकृत डीलर द्वारा भुगतान किए गए कर पर चालान के बल पर इनपुट टैक्स क्रेडिट का लाभ उठाया जा सकता है।

इनपुट टैक्स क्रेडिट का लाभ उठाने वाले व्यक्ति के रूप में, याचिकाकर्ता को केवल यह संतुष्ट करना था कि चालान में परिलक्षित कर का भुगतान पंजीकृत डीलर द्वारा किया गया था जिसने पूंजीगत सामान को बेचा था।

सारा लेवर्स बनाम वाणिज्यिक कर अधिकारी, [2010] 30 वीएसटी 581 (मैड) के मामले में उच्च न्यायालय ने अपने फैसले पर भरोसा किया और याचिकाकर्ता द्वारा लिया गया क्रेडिट रद्द नहीं किया जा सकता था, भले ही पंजीकृत डीलर ने जानबूझकर कर का भुगतान किया हो।  और ऐसे कर की घटनाओं पर पारित कर दिया।


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Popcorn’ is classified under gst rule

Popcorn’ is classified under gst rule Popcorn’ is classified under HSN 19041090, attracts 18% GST Authority for Advance Rulings, Gujarat Jay Jalaram Enterprises, In re – [2020] 117 The assessee was a proprietorship concern and manufacture Pop Corn, which sold in a sealed plastic bag bearing a registered brand name. It filed an application for advance ruling to determine classification and rate which would be applicable on the supply made by it.  It contended that its product which is popularly known as POPCORN is nothing but CORN/MAIZE, which is a CEREAL, falling under Chapter 10. The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) observed that the issue involved in this case pertains to classification of the product ‘POP CORN’ put up in unit container and bearing a registered brand name. It also observed that the product in question i.e. ‘POP CORN’ is manufactured from raw corn/maize grains, by heating in an electric machine/oven at the temperature of 1800 to 2000 centigrade and due to...

Petition filed in Supreme Court to compulsory show “Country of origin” for all products on e- commerce site

Petition filed in Supreme Court to compulsory show “Country of origin” for all products on e- commerce site Introduction A writ petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to formulate a law that mandates all the e-commerce industry/ business houses selling goods in India, through any channel to display the Country of Origin in such a way that is legible easily by the consumers; making the consumer’s aware of the ‘Country of Origin’ so as the Consumer can make an informed decision. Petition was raised on the following Questions of Law? Whether the consumer has the right to know the ‘Country of Origin’ or not so as to take a conscious decision? Whether Respondent shall attract penalties upon the e-commerce industry for non- disclosure of the ‘Country of Origin’ on the products they are selling, as it is nothing less than cheating with the consumers, as it is a matter of right for the consumers to be aware about the Country ...

Input Tax Availability on Transportation of employees

Gst update Input Tax Availability on Transportation of employees The issue regarding allowing of availability of input tax credit relating to the facilities provided to the employees by the companies has been a point of dispute between the taxpayers and department since inception of GST regime. AAR has always given a regressive ruling i.e. not in favour of taxpayers. In this update we will discuss the ruling in case of Prasar Broadcasting Corporation of India (All India Radio) pronounced by AAR, Himachal Pradesh. The AAR rejected the appellant contention based on Section 16(4) that ITC on supply of goods and services are intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business. The AAR held that rent a cab services availed by the applicant for transportation of employees are covered under clause (b) of Section 17(5) and will be allowable only on the condition that such goods or services or both is obligatory for an employer to provide to its employees under law for the time bei...